Jesus Himself seems to hint at this horror. He says, "The Son of Man will go just as it is written about him. But woe to that man who betrays the Son of Man! It would be better for him if he had not been born" (Matthew 26:24).
The Gospel of John notes that he used to dip into the money bag for himself (John 12:6), but that feels like a detail added later to make the villain uglier. In the Synoptic Gospels, the disciples are utterly shocked when Jesus announces one of them will betray him. "Surely not I, Lord?" they ask. If Judas had been a obvious thief or a snake, they would have known. He wasn't a monster. He was their friend. One of the most compelling reinterpretations suggests that Judas wasn't betraying Jesus—he was forcing his hand . Jesus Himself seems to hint at this horror
But what if we’ve been reading him wrong? What if, buried beneath the thirty pieces of silver, there is a story far more tragic, and far more unsettling, than simple greed? It would be better for him if he
Jesus Himself seems to hint at this horror. He says, "The Son of Man will go just as it is written about him. But woe to that man who betrays the Son of Man! It would be better for him if he had not been born" (Matthew 26:24).
The Gospel of John notes that he used to dip into the money bag for himself (John 12:6), but that feels like a detail added later to make the villain uglier. In the Synoptic Gospels, the disciples are utterly shocked when Jesus announces one of them will betray him. "Surely not I, Lord?" they ask. If Judas had been a obvious thief or a snake, they would have known. He wasn't a monster. He was their friend. One of the most compelling reinterpretations suggests that Judas wasn't betraying Jesus—he was forcing his hand .
But what if we’ve been reading him wrong? What if, buried beneath the thirty pieces of silver, there is a story far more tragic, and far more unsettling, than simple greed?
