He proved that a Rangroot is not defined by his lack of experience, but by his refusal to stay down. In the pantheon of forgotten warriors of the Great War, Sajjan Singh stands tall—turban wet, beard frozen, sword drawn—roaring defiance at the empires of the world.
The water was freezing, up to his chest. His turban unraveled slightly, trailing in the icy sludge. But he and a handful of other “Rangroots” emerged on the German flank. They didn’t fire volleys; they fought with the kirpan (dagger) and the brutal short sword of the khanda. sajjan singh rangroot
The men pointed to the mud-caked, shivering Sikh with frozen beard. “Sajjan Singh, sir. The Rangroot.” He proved that a Rangroot is not defined
The winter of 1914-15 was apocalyptic. The Germans, dressed in field gray, held the high ground. The Sikhs, wrapped in their distinctive turbans (which offered no camouflage and made them sniper magnets), held the low, waterlogged ditches near Neuve-Chapelle. Legend (backed by regimental war diaries) holds that Sajjan Singh was not a seasoned Jamedar or Subedar when he arrived. He was the Rangroot —the new boy. The senior British officers saw him as just another colonial number. The German intelligence, however, saw the Sikhs as “the Emperor’s madmen” for advancing in brightly colored puggris. His turban unraveled slightly, trailing in the icy sludge
When we think of World War I, the images are often fixed: muddy trenches in France, Tommy Atkins with his Enfield rifle, and the poppies of Flanders Fields. But what if we shift the lens? What if the soldier in the mud wasn’t from Manchester, but from Punjab? And what if his last name was a challenge to an empire?