One starred Mila Kunis and Justin Timberlake ( Friends with Benefits ). The other starred Natalie Portman and ( No Strings Attached ).
| Feature | No Strings Attached (Kutcher) | Friends with Benefits (Timberlake) | | :--- | :--- | :--- | | | Sweeter, indie, rainy-day aesthetic | Brighter, faster, more sexual comedy | | The Conflict | She is afraid of emotions | He is afraid of being hurt | | Best Cameo | Ludacris as a horny rapper | Woody Harrelson as a gay sports editor | | The Takeaway | Sometimes love sneaks up on you | It’s only weird if you make it weird |
Absolutely. While the premise is dated (the "Will they/Won't they" feels very 2010s), the execution holds up. It’s a movie about two people who are bad at feelings trying to logic their way through sex. ashton kutcher friends with benefits movie
While the title Friends with Benefits is more famous (thanks to that iconic train station scene), Ashton Kutcher’s entry into the genre often gets overlooked. Let’s rewind and look at why No Strings Attached is the superior comfort watch.
The rules? No jealousy. No overnights. No Valentine’s Day. And definitely . One starred Mila Kunis and Justin Timberlake (
Suggested Tags: #AshtonKutcher #RomCom #NoStringsAttached #FriendsWithBenefits #NataliePortman #MovieReview
If you were a teenager or young adult in 2011, you remember the Great Rom-Com War. That year, Hollywood gave us not one, but two movies about the same exact thing: two friends trying to add “benefits” without catching feelings. While the premise is dated (the "Will they/Won't
Plus, we get to see Ashton Kutcher in his absolute prime "Guy Next Door" era. Before he became a tech investor and a Two and a Half Men star, he was the king of the messy, funny, romantic leading man.
